Trujillo et al v. Mesa County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff: Angelice (I) Trujillo and Angelice Trujillo
Defendant: Mesa County Sheriff's Department
Case Number: 1:2009cv02359
Filed: October 2, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Mesa
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Presiding Judge: Kristen L. Mix
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 80 Minute Entry for Telephonic Discovery Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/5/2010; Plaintiff's 52 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal and Remand should be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's oral Motion to Com pel Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Testimony and 74 Motion for Leave to Correct the Complaint are DENIED AS MOOT. No further discovery shall be permitted in this court, including depositions of third parties. Any issues regarding state law claims are more properly addressed by the state court upon remand. (Court Reporter FTR - Monique Wiles) (klmcd )
November 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 78 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 75 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel rule 30(b)(6) Testimony, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/04/2010.(wjc, )
October 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 71 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 62 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Correct the Complaint Party Names and Caption. The 63 Amended Complaint, which was docketed as a separate document without leave of Court, is STRICKEN. Plaintiffs' ; 69 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend the Time Allowed for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant's Discovery Requests and Extend the Discovery Deadline is granted in party and denied in part. To the extent that Plaintiffs request an e xtension of the discovery deadline, the Motion is denied. To the extent that Plaintiffs request an extension of their deadline to respond to Defendant's outstanding discovery requests, the Motion is granted, on or before 11/03/2010. No further extensions of Plaintiffs' discovery responses shall be permitted, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/28/2010.(wjc, )
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MINUTE ORDER granting 50 Unnopposed [sic] Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference. The Settlement Conference set for 10/04/2010 at 1:30 PM is vacated and, if appropriate, will be reset upon joint motion of the parties, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 09/22/2010.(wjc, )
May 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 44 Plaintiff Angelice Trujillos Motion to Amend Complaint by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/5/2010.(klmcd)
February 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL: Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/14/2011 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/9/10. (msksec, )
January 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MINUTE ORDER granting 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff requests to amend the Complaint and states that Defendant consents to the amendment. Plaintiff has already filed the Amended Complaint in the record [Docket No. 20 ]. Granting 21 Plaintiff's Motion to Continue Scheduling/Planning Conference. Scheduling Conference set for 01/12/2010 is Vacated and Reset for 2/9/2010 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 01/11/2010.(wjc, )
November 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 14 Motion to Amend Complaint by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/12/2009.(klmcd)
October 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: As to any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and depo sitions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/26/09. (mskcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trujillo et al v. Mesa County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angelice (I) Trujillo
Represented By: Lonn M. Heymann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angelice Trujillo
Represented By: Lonn M. Heymann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mesa County Sheriff's Department
Represented By: Alan N. Hassler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?