Gerganoff v. City and County of Denver et al
Plaintiff: Mark W. Gerganoff
Defendant: City and County of Denver, David Fine and Career Service Board of the City and County of Denver
Case Number: 1:2009cv02383
Filed: October 6, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Walker D. Miller
Presiding Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS DAVID FINE IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CITY ATTORNEY AND CAREER SERVICE BOARD OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER. The stipulated motion for dismissal 58 is GRANTED. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), a ll claims asserted against defendants David Fine, in his official capacity as City Attorney, and Career Service Board of the City and County of Denver, are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/19/10.(jak, )
March 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 33 Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Fifteen Day Extension of Time to File Motion to Amend Complaint or Add Parties, and 42 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/3/2010. (mehcd)
February 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 24 Motion to Compel, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/18/2010. (mehcd)
February 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/12/2010. (mehcd)
January 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 1/22/2010, denying 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Relating to Plaintiff's Second Set of Discovery Requests. (Court Reporter FTR - C. Coomes) (mehcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gerganoff v. City and County of Denver et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark W. Gerganoff
Represented By: William Sidney Finger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City and County of Denver
Represented By: David Daniel Powell, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Fine
Represented By: David Daniel Powell, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Career Service Board of the City and County of Denver
Represented By: David Daniel Powell, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?