Wells v. Dowis et al
| Vincent Eugene Wells |
| Beverly (I) Dowis, Beverly Dowis, Cheryl (I) Smith, Cheryl Smith, Physician's Health Partners, Jo (I) Anne Stock, Jo Anne Stock, Joseph (I) Fortunato, Joseph Fortunato, Barry (I) Goldsmith and Barry Goldsmith |
| 1:2009cv02402 |
| October 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Zita L. Weinshienk |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying Motion to Reconsider. Order denying 11 Motion to Vacate. Order denying 12 Motion to Supplement and denying 12 Motion to Vacate by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 12/16/09.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 13 Notice of Appeal by Vincent Wells, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 12/09/09. Appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a proper 1915 motion in district court.(bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
10
Minute ORDER denying as unnecessary 9 Motion to Correct Pleading by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/25/09.(jjh, ) Modified on 11/30/2009 to correct spelling error (jjh, ).
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the Prisoner Complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice for Mr. Wells' failure to either pay an initial partial filing fee of $12.00 or to show cause why he has no assets and no means by which to pay the designated fee by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 11/20/09. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
