Sanchez v. Curtis et al
Plaintiff: Shaun Sanchez
Defendant: B. Curtis and Div. of Adult Parole Denver CO.
Case Number: 1:2009cv02410
Filed: October 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Kit Carson
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Presiding Judge: Kathleen M. Tafoya
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER Granting Motion to Dismiss. Granting 17 Motion to Dismiss. The remaining claim in the complaint is dismissed. Clerk to close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 8/13/10.(gmssl, )
January 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL: Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/11/2011 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 1/26/10. (msksec, )
December 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Setting Preliminary Scheduling Conference for 1/26/2010 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/07/2009. (wjc, )
November 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/27/09. (mskcd)
November 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to Dismiss In Part and to Draw Case To A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge. Claim Two is dismissed as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i). Defendant Div of Adult Parole is dismissed as a party to this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(iii). The Clerk of the Court is directed to remove Defendant Div. of Adult Parole as a party to this lawsuit. The only remaining Defendant is B. Curtis. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 11/16/2009. (sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanchez v. Curtis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaun Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. Curtis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Div. of Adult Parole Denver CO.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?