Sandoval v. Martinez-Barnish et al
Plaintiff: Cindy H. Sandoval
Defendant: Anna Martinez-Barnish and United States Department of Energy
Case Number: 1:2009cv02434
Filed: October 14, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Adams
Presiding Judge: Walker D. Miller
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Watanabe
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 226 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND/OR DEPOSITIONS, by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/15/2013. (wjmcd, )
January 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 223 ORDER on Objections to Christopher Power's Testimony. The Court has reviewed the designated portions of the transcript as well as Defendants objections. Defendants objection is SUSTAINED with respect to p. 17, lines 19-20 but OVERRULED in all other respects, by Judge William J. Martinez on 1/10/2013. (ervsl, )
January 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 217 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge William J. Martinez:Trial Preparation Conference held on 1/2/2013. Taking under advisement 190 Defendant's Motion in Limine; granting in part 212 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appea r Telephonically for Witness Scott Rogers Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 43; The Court will allow testimony from Scott Rogers by video conference from the federal courthouse in Atlanta, Georgia. ORDERED: Counsel shall submit a transcript of Mr. Powers depo sition testimony, making sure that objections have been ruled on. ORDERED: Each evening of trial both parties are directed to advise each other as to the identity and order of its witnesses scheduled to testify on the following day. ORDERED: The parties shall e-mail to Chambers by January 9, 2013 the identity of all counsel and parties that will be present at counsel table during the trial. Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel. (ervsl, )
July 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 188 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affidavit. Motion for Summary Judgment 160 is DENIED. Motion for Summary Judgment 172 is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. Motion to Strike 175 is DENIED. By Judge William J. Martinez on 7/12/12.(pabcd)
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 171 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/14/2011. (ervsl, )
March 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 149 Minute Entry for Motions Hearing held before Judge William J. Martinez: ORDERED:The Defendant's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order denying the stay of these proceedings 129 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. A written order will issue. A new discovery cutoff date and a new dispositive motion deadline, which comport with the Court's ruling on the objection, will be set forth in the written order. ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order 130 is GRANTED. The proceedings are stayed until this Court rules on Defendant's Rule 72 objection at issue in this hearing. (Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel) (wjmcd, )
February 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 145 Notice of Disclosure. Parties wishing to suggest recusal of the Judge may do so by 12:00 p.m. on 3/2/11, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/24/11. (gmssl, )
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER. Joint Status Report due by 2/23/2011, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/14/11. (mnf, )
February 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER. Defendants Motion to Stay for Proceedings 119 os DENIED. Each party shall pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/4/2011.(sah, )
September 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER. The Recommendation on the United States Motion To Substitute Itself as the Sole Defendant (Docket No. 48) 91 filed 08/24/2010, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. The objections 94 of the United States, filed 09/07/2010, and of defendant Martinez-Bar nish 95 filed 09/08/2010 are OVERRULED and DENIED. The United States Motion to Substitute Itself as the Sole Defendant 48 filed 06/18/2010, is DENIED. The United States Motion To Dismiss 32 filed 01/29/2010, is DENIED as moot because the United States is not a named defendant in this case. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/17/2010.(sah, )
July 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 69 Minute ORDER denying as moot 16 United States Department of Energy's Motion to Dismiss, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/20/10.(lyg, )
July 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Unopposed Motion to Reset Evidentiary Hearing 64 is granted. The evidentiary hearing set for 07/15/2010, at 10:00 a.m., is vacated and reset to 08/18/2010, at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom A-502. The parties shall file their exhibit lists, witness lists, and any memoranda of law no later than 12 noon on 08/11/2010. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 07/02/2010.(sah, )
February 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT: Granting 28 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint 4 . The tendered Amended Complaint and Jury Demand [28-2] is accepted for filing of the date of this Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/19/2010.(mjwcd )
January 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER. The plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal of the United States as a Party Defendant 29 is APPROVED. Plaintiff's claims against defendant, The United States Department of Energy, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with the parties to bear their attorney fees and costs. Defendant, The United States Department if Energy, is DROPPED as a party to this action, and the caption shall be amended accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 01/28/2010. (sah, )
December 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MINUTE ORDER granting 17 Unopposed Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set on 12/17/2009, at 8:00 a.m. is VACATED. The parties shall file with this court a joint written status report on the first day of each month beginning January 2010. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/01/2009.(sah, )
October 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 12/17/2009 08:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/20/2009. (mjwcd )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sandoval v. Martinez-Barnish et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cindy H. Sandoval
Represented By: Gary B. Witt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anna Martinez-Barnish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Energy
Represented By: Juan Gonzalo Villasenor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?