Manderson v. Forest Oil Corporation
Plaintiff: Neville Manderson
Defendant: Forest Oil Corporation
Case Number: 1:2009cv02488
Filed: October 22, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David M. Ebel
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Watanabe
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER. The Court, having reviewed the parties Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice, and being apprised of its contents, hereby dismisses this action with prejudice and with each party paying its own costs and attorneys fees. By Judge David M. Ebel on 1/20/2011. (sah, )
December 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MINUTE ORDER Denying 71 Joint Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference. Granting 73 Amended Motion to Vacate Hearing. Motion Hearing 12/14/2010 08:30 AM is vacated. Dismissal Papers due by 1/7/2011. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/13/2010.(mjwcd)
November 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MINUTE ORDER. The two motions to withdraw motions to compel 57 and 58 are granted, and thus 52 and 54 are withdrawn. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/12/2010.(sah, )
September 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 45 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Entered as amended by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 9/9/2010. (mjwcd)
August 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Amended Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Extend time for Serving All Expert Disclosures Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) 33 is granted. Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Extend Time for Serving Disclosures Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) of a Statistical Expert 30 is denied as moot. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 08/13/2010.(sah, )
August 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MINUTE ORDER denying 26 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery and Motion for Sanctions, as set forth in this Minute Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 8/10/2010.(mjwcd)
June 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER granting 23 plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Amendment of Scheduling Order 12 . Discovery for the limited purpose of deposition experts due by 10/31/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 11/30/2010. by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/7/2010.(mjwcd)
November 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER : Scheduling Conference set for 12/22/2009 10:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/6/2009. (mjwcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manderson v. Forest Oil Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neville Manderson
Represented By: Karen Hendrick Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Forest Oil Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?