USA v. Rodriguez
USA |
Louie M. Rodriguez |
1:2009cv02598 |
November 4, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Montrose |
Lewis T. Babcock |
None |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER pursuant to the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. This case is dismissed, without prejudice, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 12/14/10. (ebs, ) |
Filing 30 ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION. Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00304-WDM and 09-cv-02598-LTB are consolidated into a single civil action with all further pleadings in the consolidated civil actions to bear the case caption United States v. Louis M. Rodriguez, Civil Action No. 09-cv00304-WDM, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 6/1/10. (ebs, ) |
Filing 25 ORDER. Respondent failed to appear on Tuesday, 05/25/2010 at 10:30 a.m. but instead called the Clerks Office stating that he would not be at the hearing as he is still in Montrose, Colorado. Respondent continues to be in civil contempt of this Cour t pursuant to the 03/04/2010 Order 15 and is additionally in civil contempt of this Court for failure to complywith this Courts 05/06/2010 Order 24 . A warrant for Respondents arrest shall be issued and served upon Respondent by the United States Marshals Service with further proceedings to be scheduled in this case if and when appropriate. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 05/25/2010. (sah, ) |
Filing 24 ORDER. A further status hearing is set for 05/25/2010 at 10:30 a.m.. Defendant shall bring copies of all documents identified in the IRS summons to the 05/25/2010 hearing. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 05/06/2010. (sah, ) |
Filing 20 ORDER. Defendant is discharged from the custody of the U.S. Marshal Service on the condition that he make an appointment and provide his records to the IRS at a date and time certain before 05/04/2010. A Status Conference is set for 5/6/2010 11:00 AM in Courtroom C401 before Judge Lewis T. Babcock. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 04/14/2010. (sah, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER. Respondent is in civil contempt for failure to comply with the Courts 11/06/2009 Order to Show Cause; Final Enforcement Order; and 02/03/2010 Order to Show Cause. A warrant for Respondents arrest shall be issued and served upon Respondent by the U.S. Marshal Service. Further proceedings will be scheduled in this case if and when appropriate. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 03/04/2010. (sah, ) |
Filing 5 FINAL ENFORCEMENT ORDER. This case shall be closed and Judgment shall be entered in favor of Petitioner United States of America. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/17/2009. (sah, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: USA v. Rodriguez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: USA | |
Represented By: | Amanda Adams Rocque |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Louie M. Rodriguez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.