Montle v. Carboline Company
Plaintiff: John Montle
Defendant: Carboline Company
Case Number: 1:2009cv02734
Filed: November 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: La Plata
Presiding Judge: Philip A. Brimmer
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting 11 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. This case is dismissed with prejudice, with each side to pay for their own costs, if any. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Motion to Remand 10 is deemed moot, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/30/09. (ebs, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Montle v. Carboline Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Montle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carboline Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?