Anderson v. Harper
| Jeffrey B. Anderson |
| Allen C. Harper |
| 1:2009cv02776 |
| November 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL re: 51 : this action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their own attorney fees and costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/27/2012. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER Administratively Closing Case re: 47 by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 09/09/11. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER Extending Time to File Settlement Papers. Granting re: 45 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE SETTLEMENT PAPERS. Dismissal Paper due by 9/8/2011, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/30/2011. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
32
Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Trial Preparation Conference held on 8/5/2011 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Stipulated Motion to Allow Trial Testimony of Heath Alexander, Esq., by Telephone 31 , is denied. Briefs due August 12, 2011. Proposed jury instructions and voir dire submitted in paper format directly to chambers by August 16, 2011. (FTR: K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Setting Jury Trial for 8/22/2011 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/29/2011. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Granting re: 21 Stipulated Motion to Conduct One Additional Deposition and Limited Additional Discovery, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/21/2011. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying request for an extension of the deadline to file dispositive motions re: 17 , signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/1/2011. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Modify 10 Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 12/31/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 3/31/2011. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/20/2010.(rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
9
Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Scheduling Conference held on 3/26/2010 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Answer, filed March 25, 2010 8 , is granted and the Amended Answer is accepted and filed today.(Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 3/26/2010 at 02:30 PM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on March 18, 2010, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/29/2010. (rpmcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Anderson v. Harper | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeffrey B. Anderson | |
| Represented By: | Victor M. Morales |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Allen C. Harper | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
