Crossen et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
||Mark S. Crossen and Oceanne Crossen
||American Family Mutual Insurance Company
||December 7, 2009
||US District Court for the District of Colorado
||Walker D. Miller
||Kristen L. Mix
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 7, 2010
ORDER denying 4 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Duty to Defend. Because I conclude as a matter of law that Defendant did not have a duty to defend, and this issue is dispositive of Plaintiffs' claims, judgment shall enter in favor of Defendant American Family Insurance and against Plaintiffs on all claims. Defendant may have its costs, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 7/7/10.(ebs, )
|January 13, 2010
ORDER granting 8 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading on Behalf of Defendant American Family Mutual Insurance Company. American Family Mutual Insurance Company answer due 1/14/2010. Granting 9 Defendant's Uno pposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, to on or before 1/29/2010. Granting 11 Joint Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference and Stay Proceedings. The case is stayed until such time as the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 4 is resolved. The Scheduling Conference set for 2/8/2010 at 9:30 a.m. is vacated and will be reset, if appropriate, upon expiration of the stay, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/13/10.(ebs, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?