Rist v. Department of Veterans Affairs
William J. Rist |
Department of Veterans Affairs |
1:2009cv02884 |
December 10, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Douglas |
Boyd N. Boland |
Michael E. Hegarty |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 97 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/7/2010. (erv, ) |
Filing 94 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 91 the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/17/2010. (mehcd) |
Filing 90 MINUTE ORDER Denying as moot 31 Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, In light of the settlement, Dismissal papers are due 11/12/2010. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/27/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 88 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 86 Plaintiff's Request [Motion] to Amend Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/19/2010. (mehcd) |
Filing 67 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 65 Plaintiff's Request to Amend Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/12/2010. (mehcd) |
Filing 61 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 58 Plaintiff's Motion to Remove, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/20/2010. (mehcd) |
Filing 55 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 52 Plaintiff's Request for Monetary Relief, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/12/2010. (mehcd) |
Filing 49 MINUTE ORDER denying 47 Motion for Order to Abate. The word abate may mean lessen or put an end to. It is unclear from Plaintiffs motion whether he seeks an order dismissing the case or requests that the Court take some other action. Therefore, the Plaintiff may re-file the motion further explaining his request for relief. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/6/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 45 MINUTE ORDER denying 40 Plaintiff's Motion for Independent JAG Mediator, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/19/2010. (mehcd) |
Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 21 Plaintiff's Request for Relief. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/18/2010. (mehcd) (Modified on 2/19/2010 added without prejudice to the text)(erv, ). |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER denying 6 Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude the VA Office of Regional Counsel from court appearances as premature. There has yet been no appearance by the Defendant in this action. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/21/09.(erv, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/14/2009. (sah, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rist v. Department of Veterans Affairs | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: William J. Rist | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Department of Veterans Affairs | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.