Gouldner v. Payday Everyday of Colorado, Inc. et al
Gabrielle Gouldner |
Payday Everyday of Colorado, Inc., Fastbucks Holding Corporation, Fastbucks Management Company, LLC, Fastbucks Franchise Corporation and Fastbucks Wage and Benefits, LLC |
1:2009cv03035 |
December 30, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Adams |
Lewis T. Babcock |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. A Stipulated Notice of Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed on 4/19/2011. This matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own fees and costs. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/20/2011. (sah, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER. Defendants Motion to Dismiss, or to Abate Proceedings, filed 12/30/2009, 4 is GRANTED. All further proceedings are STAYED until arbitration has been completed. The parties shall file a status report or a motion to dismiss within thirty (30) days of the completion of arbitration. The parties are to bear their own costs and fees. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 03/03/02010.(sah, ) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion for Clarification of the Deadline to Respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss 6 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs response is due on or before January 25, 2010, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on January 6, 2010.(ltbcd, ) Modified on 1/13/2010 to correct the filed date (sah2, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.