Kersh v. Smelser et al
| Lionel Kersh |
| Richard Smelser and John William Suthers |
| 1:2010cv00090 |
| January 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Crowley |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER Denying Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal after Review re 12 Notice of Appeal by Lionel Kersh, by Judge Christine M. Arguello for Senior Judge Zita Weinshienk on 05/19/10. (bjrsl, ) Modified on 5/19/2010 to add Judge Weinshienk to text (bjrsl, ).
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the second and final amended application is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the pleading requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Ordered that no certificate of appealiablity will issue because Applicant has no made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 04/02/10 for Zita Lesson Weinshienk(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER to File Second and Final Amended Application within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 02/24/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant shall have 30 days to file a complete petition, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/14/10. (jak, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
