Powers v. Hicks et al
| John J. Powers |
| Elizabeth Hicks, Tasha Dobbs and Keith Bradley |
| 1:2010cv00160 |
| January 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Bent |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 27 filed 05/3/2010, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Defendant Keith Bradleys Motion To Dismiss 11 filed 02/26/2010, is DENIED as moot. The plaintiffs Motion Requesting a Temporary Restraining Order Per Rule 65 22 filed 04/05/2010, is DENIED as moot. This case is DISMISSED based on the plaintiffs failure to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1M., and under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b), for failure to prosecute. JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favor of the defendants, Elizabeth Hicks,CPO, Tasha Dobbs, CPO, and Keith Bradley, Homeless Shelter Operator, against the plaintiff, John J. Powers. The defendants are AWARDED their costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 08/24/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Assigning Case. This case shall be assigned to District Judge Robert E. Blackburn, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1C.1., and to Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 01/29/2010. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
