Mitchell v. HOV Services, Inc. et al
| William G. Mitchell |
| HOV Services, Inc. and Bay Area Credit Services, LLC |
| 1:2010cv00226 |
| February 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Lewis T. Babcock |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 38 U.S.C. ยง 4301 Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. A Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice was filed on 11/30/2010. This matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own fees and costs. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/01/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Setting Settlement Conference for 1/10/2011 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/22/10. (lyg, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER. A Scheduling/Planning Conference is set for 7/22/2010 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 06/24/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER. The Motion to Dismiss 7 filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) by Defendant HOV Services, Inc. seeking dismissal of the claims asserted against it by Plaintiff, William G. Mitchell, is DENIED. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 05/20/2010.(sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
