Watkins v. Love et al
| Jamaal Watkins |
| Nathan Love, Division of Adult Parole, Community Corrections, and YOS and Colorado Department of Corrections |
| 1:2010cv00358 |
| February 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER. Plaintiffs objection 24 is overruled. The Amended Recommendation 23 is accepted and adopted in its entirety. Plaintiffs Motion For Default Judgment 20 is denied. The amended complaint 7 and cause of action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve the Defendant, failure to prosecute this civil action, and failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.1. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 10/20/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/21/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Second Amended Complaint within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 03/11/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to file a complaint on the proper court form, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/18/10. (jak, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
