Abdullah-Al-Steven-Lamont-El v. People of the State of Colorado et al
| Muhammad M. Abdullah-Al-Steven-Lamont-El |
| People of the State of Colorado, City and County of Denver, Manager of Safety and Ex-Officio Sheriff |
| 1:2010cv00424 |
| February 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the habeas corpus applications are denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to file an amended pleading as directed. Ordered that no certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 06/21/10 for Zita Leeson Weinshienk(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER to Cure Deficiency. Ordered that Applicant cure the deficiency within 30 days. ORDER denying as moot 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and denying as moot 7 Motion to Amend by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/16/10.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
1
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant shall have 30 days to file a petition and 1915 motion on the proper court forms, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/24/10. (jak, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
