Freeman v. Daniels
| Marcus L. Freeman |
| C. Daniels |
| 1:2010cv00480 |
| March 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER of Dismissal. ORDERED that the amended complaint and the action are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) as legally frivolous. FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions 48 are denied as moot, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 6/7/11.(lygsl, )
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/11/11. (lyg, )
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Allowing Plaintiff to Proceed Without Payment of an Initial Partial Filing Fee, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/30/11. (lyg, )
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER. Freemans motion for reconsideration 24 is GRANTED. The Courts order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Freemans action with prejudice 22 is VACATED. This habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 67; 2241 shall be construed as a civil rights action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1361, and Bivens. The clerk of the Court shall change the docket record to reflect the proper nature of this action. By Judge David M. Ebel on 12/7/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 25 Notice of Appeal by Marcus Freeman, by Judge David M. Ebel on 09/16/10. Appellant has 30 days to file a certified trust fund account statement.(bjr, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER. The Court ADOPTS 20 the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and orders that Petitioners Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be DENIED. Petitioners action is thus DISMISSED with prejudice, and judgment shall be entered accordingly. By Judge David M. Ebel on 08/19/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ASSIGNING CASE. This case shall be assigned to District Judge David M. Ebel pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1C.1., and to Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/07/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER denying 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 05/04/10 for Zita Lesson Weinshienk(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
1
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant shall have 30 days to file a petition and 1915 motion on the proper court forms, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/26/10. (jak, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Freeman v. Daniels | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: C. Daniels | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marcus L. Freeman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
