Sternberg v. City and County of Denver et al
| Jacob Sternberg |
| City and County of Denver, Deborah Dilley, Anthony Foster and Anthony Martinez |
| 1:2010cv00629 |
| March 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Philip A. Brimmer |
| Kathleen M. Tafoya |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER for Dismissal of Plaintiff Jacob Sternberg. ORDERED that Plaintiff Sternbergs Complaint, and all claims relating to or arising therefrom, are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and attorney fees by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 08/01/11. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER for Consolidation. Pursuant to the hearing held on 05/19/10 the defendants motion to consolidate civil actions, filed in Civil Action 09-cv-02197-RPM, seeking consolidation with Civil Action 10-cv-00629-PAB-KMT. ORDERED that these civil actions are consolidated and will proceed under the above caption. ORDERED that the order of reference to Magistrate Judge Tafoya in 10-cv-00629-PAB-KMT is vacated by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 05/19/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 6/15/2010 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 3/22/10. (ebs, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
