Smith v. OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. et al
Bradley C. Smith |
OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc., Brian F. Wruble, David K. Downes, Matthew P. Fink, Phillip A. Griffiths, Mary F. Miller, Joel W. Motley, Mary Ann Tynan, Joseph M. Wikler, Peter I. Wold, John V. Murphy, Russell S. Reynolds, Jr. and Oppenheimer Gold & Special Minerals Fund |
1:2010cv00655 |
March 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
John L. Kane |
Stockholders Suits |
15 U.S.C. ยง 0080 Investment Company Act of 1940 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' AMENDED MOTIONS TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) & 1406(a). Defendants' 18 Amended Motions to Transfer Venue (Doc. 20 in Civil Action No. 10-cv-654-JLK (Quest Action) and Doc. 18 in Civil Action No. 10-cv-655-JLK (Minerals Action) are GRANTED, and the cases TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, by Judge John L. Kane on 09/23/2010.(wjc, ) Modified on 9/24/2010 to correct spelling error (wjc, ). |
Filing 41 MINUTE ORDER denying 11 Motion to Stay by Judge John L. Kane on 08/20/2010.(wjc, ) |
Filing 21 ORDER granting 19 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Set Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Amended Transfer Motion. Plaintiff's response to the Amended Transfer Motion is due on 6/17/10, by Judge John L. Kane on 6/15/10.(ebs, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.