Worrell v. Colorado Community Bank et al
| Charles Sam Worrell |
| Washington Investment Company, Colorado Community Bank and Jerry Bryant |
| 1:2010cv00671 |
| March 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Zita L. Weinshienk |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 633 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/18/10. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER : Scheduling Conference set for 8/11/2010 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/22/10. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER. Defendants Motion To Dismiss 8 is granted. The first, second, and fourth claims for relief in Plaintiffs Complaint are dismissed with prejudice. The fifth and sixth claims for relief in Plaintiffs Complaint are dismissed with prejudice aga inst Defendant Jerry Bryant only. Defendant Jerry Bryant is dismissed from this action with prejudice, and the caption shall be amended accordingly. This action shall proceed on the third claim for relief against Defendant Colorado Community Bank, and on the fifth and sixth claims for relief against Defendants Colorado Community Bank and Washington Investment Company. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 07/21/2010.(sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
