Kraft v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. et al
| Garold B. Kraft |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Washington Mutual Bank, Bill Wallace and Summit County Public Trustee |
| 1:2010cv00815 |
| April 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Summit |
| Robert E. Blackburn |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER. The Order To Show Cause 57 entered 11/24/2010, is DISCHARGED. Plaintiffs claims against defendant, Bill Wallace, Summit County PublicTrustee, are DISMISSED. Judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendants, JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Asso ciation, successor in interest to Washington Mutual Bank, in accordance with my Order Granting Motion To Dismiss [#56] entered 11/23/2010, and Bill Wallace, Summit County Public Trustee, in accordance with this Order, and against plaintiff, Garold B. Kraft, as to all claims for relief and causes of action. Defendants are AWARDED their costs. This case is DISMISSED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/08/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting 45 JP Morgan Chase Bank's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs claims against defendant, JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, successor in interest to Washington Mutual Bank, are DISMISSED in their entirety. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is AMENDED accordingly, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/23/10.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER: granting 36 JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.s Unopposed Motion to Establish Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint or Third Amended Complaint. All Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the third a mended complaint on or before June 24, 2010. Granting 34 Plaintiffs Second Amended Motion to File Third Amended Complaint Without Opposition. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing the Third Amended Complaint, Request for Temporary Restraining Order, Injunctive Relief and Declaratory Relief and Damages [Doc. # 34-2] (the Third Amended Complaint), by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/9/10.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER: denying without prejudice 27 plaintiffs Second Amended Motion to File Third AmendedComplaint Without Opposition. The parties shall submit, on or before June 4, 2010, confidential settlement statements in anticipation of the scheduling conference set to occur next week, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/2/10.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
26
MINUTE ORDER. The Amended Motion to File Third Amended Complaint Without Opposition 24 is STRICKEN for not following D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(G) (certificate of service) and 10.1 (E) (double-spaced). By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/25/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
23
MINUTE ORDER striking 20 the Motion to File Third Amended ComplaintWithout Opposition. The Motion is STRICKEN for not following D.C.COLO.LCivR5.1(G) and 10.1 (E). The proposed Third Amended Complaint must be filed as an attachment to the Motion. The name of the plaintiff in the caption is spelled Fraft, but spelled as Kraft in all else. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/21/2010.(sah2, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER : Scheduling Conference set for 6/9/2010 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/27/10. (bnbcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
