Crosby v. Heil et al
Plaintiff: David James Crosby
Defendant: Margaret Heil, J. D. Scollard, Christine Tyler, Christina Marquez, Rich Lins, Burl McCullar and Jaylynne Chupp
Case Number: 1:2010cv00951
Filed: April 27, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Kit Carson
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER Affirming Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Magistrate Judge Hegartys Recommendation 138 is ACCEPTED; Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 93 is GRANTED; and The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants on all claims, by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/12/12.(lygsl, )
July 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 131 MINUTE ORDER granting 127 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Response Out of Time, and 128 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit. No further supplements will be accepted. Defendants may file a reply on or before 8/1/2011. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 7/19/2011. (mehcd)
May 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 120 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 5/31/2011, denying without prejudice 104 Plaintiff's Motion to Deny Defendant's [sic] Motion for Summary Jud gment, and denying 117 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery. Telephonic Status Conference set for 6/8/2011 at 9:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Telephonic Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/5/2011 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (FTR: C. Coomes -- Courtroom A-501) (mehcd)
May 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 100 MINUTE ORDER Before the Court is Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment filed April 29, 2011; docket 93 . Plaintiff shall respond on or before May 26, 2011. Defendants may reply within fourteen days of Plaintiffs response. Granting 98 Defendants Motion to Submit Compact Disc for Filing by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/5/2011.(erv, )
March 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER granting in part, denying in part, and denying as moot in part 73 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery; and granting 83 Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement Discovery Request. Discovery due by 3/31/2011. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/8/2011. (mehcd)
February 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER The parties are directed to confer and to file a Joint Status Report due by 2/25/2011. by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/16/2011. (erv, )
January 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 1/26/2011, granting in part and denying in part 51 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery and to Order Waiver of Objection, and denying as moot 55 Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Subpoenas. Reset Deadlines: Discovery due by 3/15/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 4/15/2011. (FTR: C. Coomes -- Courtroom A-501) (mehcd)
December 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MINUTE ORDER denying 40 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/22/2010. (mehcd)
October 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER granting in part and denying without prejudice in part 35 Plaintiff's Motion to Modify Discovery Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/28/2010. (mehcd)
October 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MINUTE ORDER granting 30 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Plaintiff's Amended Complaint located at docket #30-1. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/7/2010. (mehcd)
September 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL: Rule 16 Hearing set for 7/1/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/8/10. (msksec, )
June 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trial s, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and depositions from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/22/10. (mskcd)
June 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Granting Service by United States Marshal by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 06/15/2010. (wjc, )
June 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Drawing Case. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. Plaintiff's " Motion for Special Assignment Pursuant to Local Rule 40.1C" filed on 04/27/2010 is denied. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/08/2010.(sah, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crosby v. Heil et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David James Crosby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Margaret Heil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. D. Scollard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christine Tyler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christina Marquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rich Lins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Burl McCullar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jaylynne Chupp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?