Madison v. Sloan et al
| Rodrick D. Madison |
| Brigham Sloan, Executive Director and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2010cv00975 |
| April 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Bent |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that Rodrick D. Madison's amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 7 is denied and this action is dismissed as barred by the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. Ordered that there is no basis on which to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253(c) by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/19/10 for Zita Leeson Weinshienk(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER re: Reply to Supplemental Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 21 days Applicant may file a Reply to the Supplemental Pre-Answer Response by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/02/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER to Supplement Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that on or before 09/03/10 Respondents shall file a supplement to the pre-answer response by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/19/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER Directing Applicant to File Amended Application within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 05/10/10. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
