Morris v. USA et al
| Curtis L. Morris |
| USA, United States District Court for the District of Colorado, United States District Court, Internal Revenue Service, Greg M. Flynn, David M. Gaoulette, James C. Strong and Eric Holder |
| 1:2010cv01001 |
| May 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Elbert |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER re: 18 Tendered Document filed by Curtis L. Morris; The Tendered First Amended Complaint for Trespass, Trespass on the Case, and Replevin Verified is not accepted for filing. It was tendered after the case was dismissed and Plaintiff did not file a motion to reconsider the order of dismissal or a motion for leave to file an amended complaint with the Court. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 6/18/2010. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DISMISSING CASE An action must be commenced through the filing of a complaint, not a counterclaim. Since this action was not commenced through a proper pleading, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 5/17/2010. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Tafoya recused. Clerk to assign another magistrate judge by random draw. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 05/11/2010. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
