Cardenas v. Hartley et al
| Alexander Cardenas |
| Steve Hartley and John W. Suthers |
| 1:2010cv01037 |
| May 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Chaffee |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER Denying Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal after Review re 28 Notice of Appeal by Alexander Cardenas, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 07/05/11. (bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER DENYING With Prejudice 3 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Alexander Cardenas. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability should not issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a con stitutional right. A certificate of appealability may issue only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Applicant is not entitled to a certificate of appealability. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/22/2011. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER for State Court Record. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this order to the clerk of the state court from which the case originated and to the Court Services Manager, State Court Administrators Office by United States mail, f irst class postage prepaid, at the following addresses: Clerk of the Court, Denver District Court, Lindsey-Flanigan Courthouse 520 West Colfax Ave, Room 135, Denver, CO 80204, and Court Services Manager State Court Administrators Office, 101 W. Colfax, Suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202 by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/15/2011. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER to Draw in Part and to Dismiss in Part. Claims Two, Three, Four, and Five are dismissed as procedurally barred. Claims One and Six shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer for Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 08/16/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER to Supplement Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that on or before 08/09/10, Respondents shall file a supplement to the pre-answer response that complies with this Order by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 07/26/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 21 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 21 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 05/10/10. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
