Scottsdale Insurance Company v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA |
| 1:2010cv01092 |
| May 11, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Richard P. Matsch |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA against Scottsdale Insurance Company re 62 Order: defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh. PA. shall have its costs by the filing of a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of this court within fourteen (14) days of entry of this judgment, by Deputy Clerk on 12/3/2012. (rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
45
Courtroom Minutes for Motions Hearing held on 12/28/2011 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Defendant's Motion to Compel Responses to Written Discovery 40 , is denied. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Further Extension of Time to Serve Expert Disclosures and for Remaining Deadlines 38 , is granted. Expert disclosure March 15, 2012. Rebuttal expert disclosure April 13, 2012. Discovery cut-off May 31, 2012. Dispositive Motions June 29, 2012. (FTR: K. Terasaki) (rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Granting 23 Motion for Second Amendment to Scheduling Order and Plaintiff's Second 24 Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to Discovery. Deadline for plaintiff to respond to interrogatories, requests for admission and requests for production is extended to and including May 20, 2011. Discovery due by 12/1/2011., Dispositive Motions due by 12/30/2011 (see Order for other deadlines). Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/13/2011.(rpmcd)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Extending Deadlines Re 17 and 7 . Discovery due by 9/1/2011, Dispositive Motions due by 10/1/2011, (see Order for other deadlines), signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/12/2011.(rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granitng Filing of Amended Complaint re: 10 , 13 and 11 . Amended Complaint tendered therewith is filed, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/22/2010. (rpmcd )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 7/16/2010 at 02:00 PM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on July 8, 2010, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/12/2010. (rpmcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scottsdale Insurance Company v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scottsdale Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Steven Jay Dawes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA | |
| Represented By: | Jane E. Young |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
