Alpers v. Town of Erie et al
| John H. Alpers, Jr. |
| Town of Erie, John Hall, Rex Brown and Phil Lukens |
| 1:2010cv01105 |
| May 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Boulder |
| Walker D. Miller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER granting 14 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary judgment shall enter in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff on all claims. Defendants may have their costs, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 2/24/11.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER Regarding Voluntary Dismissal. 54 Plaintiff's Amended Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Claims for Relief Four and Five and Paragraphs B and C of Plaintiff's Prayer for Relief, which is construed as a motion to amend, is granted. Plaintiff shall file, no later than 1/7/2011, an amended complaint, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 12/29/10.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
32
COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: A Motion Hearing was held on 9/15/2010. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Permit Further Discovery Pursuant to FRCP 56(f), doc # 25 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The court finds that there is justification for limited discovery. To the extent that the Motion seeks that opportunity, the Motion is GRANTED. The Motion is DENIED in all other respects. A Telephonic Status Conference is set for 10/15/2010 at 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (Counsel shall coordinate a conference call among themselves prior to contacting the court at 303.844.2117 at the scheduled time.) By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (Court Reporter FTR - Linda Kahoe) (cbscd)
|
|
Filing
23
COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: A Scheduling Conference was held on 7/27/2010. Discovery due by 3/31/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 4/29/2011. A Telephonic Status Conference is set for 9/30/2010 at 10:45 AM before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. Counsel shall coordinate a conference call among themselves prior to contacting the court at 303.844.2117 at the scheduled time. A Final Pretrial Conference is set for 7/21/2011 at 09:15 AM before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. A Proposed Final Pretrial Order is due 5 days prior. ORDERED: Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Determination of Qualified Immunity, doc # 15 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the individual defendan ts' rights to assert qualified immunity in response to specific discovery requests, as appropriate. The court is also DENYING the Motion to Stay Discovery WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the Town of Erie's right to object, consistent with the factors set forth in Rule 26(b)(2)(c). ORDERED: Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment & Motion to Stay Discovery # 20 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTE D to the extent that it seeks time to respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment # 14 . The Response to the Motion for Summary Judgment is due on or before JULY 30, 2010. The Motion is DENIED AS MOOT to the extent that it seeks time to respond to the Motion to Stay Discovery. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (Court Reporter FTR - Linda Kahoe) (cbscd)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER setting Scheduling Conference for 7/27/2010 at 9:15 a.m., in Courtroom A 402, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 5/19/10. (cbssec)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
