Conejos County Citizens v. San Luis & Rio Grande Railroad, Inc. et al
| Conejos County Citizens |
| San Luis & Rio Grande Railroad, Inc. and Energy Solutions, Inc. |
| 1:2010cv01206 |
| May 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Conejos |
| Lewis T. Babcock |
| Commercial/ICC Rates/etc. |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 10101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER. The Plaintiff filed a Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(A)(I) 41 on 09/22/2010. This matter shall be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own fees and costs. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 09/23/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER. The recommendation 10 is accepted and Plaintiffs Request for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc 2) is DENIED. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 06/23/2010.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER : on or before September 22, 2010, the plaintiffs shall file proof of service on the defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l) and (m). Failure to file proof of service on or before September 22, 2010, may result in dismissal of this action, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/7/10. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER. It has come to the Courts attention that there is confusion as to who should receive notification of service from the parties and the Court in this matter. Please see Order regarding the parties to receive notice. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 06/01/2010. (sah, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
