Schwartz v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
| Keith A. Schwartz |
| Bank of America, N.A. and Bill Wallace |
| 1:2010cv01225 |
| May 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Summit |
| Wiley Y. Daniel |
| Other Fraud |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
ORDER. ORDERED, that judgment shall enter in favor of Defendant Bank of America, N.A. on its claim for breach of contract and that judgment should enter against Keith A. Schwartz in the amount of $1,680,065.05, and post judgment interest of 6.3 75%, plus costs and attorney fees of collecting on this judgment. ORDERED, that the trial set for December 7, 2011 and the Trial Preparation Conference set for November 21, 2011 are VACATED. ORDERED, that Defendant Bank of Americas Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiffs Expert Curtis Novy 91 , is DENIED as MOOT in light of the parties Stipulation for Judgment and this Order by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 11/16/11.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER. Ordered that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on its Counterclaim, 45 is denied by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 06/07/11.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER. ORDERED that Defendants Bank of American, N.A.s and BAC Home LoanServicing, LPs Motion Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand 41 is GRANTED. ORDERED that Defendant Bank of Americas Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunctio n and Request for a Forthwith Hearing 26 and Defendant Bank of America, N.A.s Request for Hearing on Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction 49 are DENIED AS MOOT. ORDERED that Plaintiffs Request for Sanctions 33 is DENIED. ORDERED that Defendant Bank of America, N.A.s Motion for Sanctions Under Rule 11 43 is DENIED by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 03/28/11.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
69
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe: Telephonic Status Conference held on 2/14/2011. Denying as moot 56 Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Allow for Designation of a Handwriting Expert by January 15, 2011. (Court Reporter/FTR: Ellen E. Miller) (mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER granting 57 Defendants' Bank of America, N.A. and BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. The Bank Defendants may have up to and including 1/30/2011 in which to designate an expert in the area of handwriting analysis. Plaintiff may have up to and including 3/2/2011 in which to designate a rebuttal expert. Plaintiff must submit handwriting samples as requested at his deposition on 1/19/2011, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/4/11.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER DISMISSING PARTY. The 48 Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot. Defendant Stephen Tsompanas is dismissed from this action without prejudice, each party to pay his own costs and attorneys' fees, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 12/28/10.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
32
MINUTE ORDER striking 30 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 10/20/2010.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
24
MINUTE ORDER granting 20 Counsel for Defendant Bill Wallace's Motion to Vacate Show Cause Hearing. Show Cause Hearing 9/28/2010 11:30 AM is vacated, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 9/27/2010.(mjwcd)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER Scheduling Conference set for 8/19/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/7/2010. (mjwcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
