Lazarov v. Kimmel et al
Malina Lazarov |
James Kimmel, Suzanne Staiert, John Jones and Trent Cooper |
1:2010cv01238 |
May 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
Christine M. Arguello |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 ORDER denying 98 Motion to Stay of Final Judgment of a District Court pending Appeal by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 03/11/11.(bjrsl, ) |
Filing 94 ORDER That the United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabes January 21, 2001 Recommendation 90 is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED; Defendants Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 15 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) 17 , is GR ANTED; Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Defendants Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 30 is DENIED; Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Watanabes Order Denying Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Defendants Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Pleadings Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 88 is DENIED AS MOOT; and This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 2/9/2011.(erv, ) |
Filing 89 ORDER. 77 Plaintiff's Moton [sic] for Reconsideration of Magistrate's Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Resposive [sic] Pleading to Thiis [sic] Court's Order Denying Her Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff 9;s AmendedComplaint Pursuant to Court Orders and D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 is denied. 80 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, by District Court Judge C. Arguello, of Magistrate Judge M. Watanabe's Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Re consideration of Magistrate's Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference Scheduled for 11/18/2010 Before Magistrate Judge Watanabe is denied. 86 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Watana be's Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Pleadings Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 is denied. 64 Motion for Leave for Enlargement of Time to File a Responsive Pleading to this Court's Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Responsive Pleading to this Court's Order Denying Her Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff' s Amended Complaint Pursuant to Court Orders and D.C.COLOLCiv.R 7.1 is granted. 66 Motion for Leave for Enlargement of Time to File a Responsive Pleading to This Court's Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amendment to Pleadings Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f), Court Orders and D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 is denied as moot, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/18/11.(mnf, ) |
Filing 85 MINUTE ORDER denying 83 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Pleadings Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1, which this court has construed as a motion to strike, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/29/10.(mnf, ) |
Filing 79 MINUTE ORDER denying 65 Pro Se Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Pleadings Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) andD.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/17/2010.(mjwcd) |
Filing 78 MINUTE ORDER denying 75 Pro Se Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrate's Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amendment to Pleadings Pursuant to Fed. R. civ. P. 12(f), Court Orders and D.C.COLO.LCivR7.1, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/15/10.(mnf, ) |
Filing 71 MINUTE ORDER denying 68 Palintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrates Order Granting Defendants Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference Scheduled for November 18, 2010 before Magistrate Judge Watanabe by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/7/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 63 ORDER granting 61 Defendant's Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference Scheduled for November 18, 2010 Before Magistrate Judge Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/15/2010.(mjwcd) |
Filing 60 MINUTE ORDER GRANTING 56 defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Responsive Pleading to this Courts Order Denying Her Motion to Dimiss Defendants Reply in Support of Their Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint Pursuant to Court Ord er and D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1; STRIKING 49 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court; GRANTING 57 defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Amendment to Pleadings Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f), Cort Orders and D.C.COLO..LCiv.R. 7.1; STRIKING 52 Supplement/Amendment by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/5/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 55 ORDER granting 53 Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery. All pending and future discovery in this case is stayed until after the Court rules on 17 Defendants' Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (CM/ECF Docket No. 15) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) And Brief in Support of Motion, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/1/2010.(mjwcd) |
Filing 46 MINUTE ORDER denying 42 plaintiffs Request for Leave to Counterclaim to Defendants Reply in Support of Their Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(B)(6) ; denying 44 Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Dismiss Defendants Reply in Support of Their Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(B)(6), which this court has construed as a motion to strike defendants reply, is denied. by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 9/30/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 41 MINUTE ORDER denying 38 plaintiffs Motion for Permission to Reply to Defendants' reply in Support of Their Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6), as supplemented, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 9/14/2010.(mjwcd) |
Filing 34 MINUTE ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Motion for a Second Enlargement of Time Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(1) and 12(f) 28 is granted to the extent that paragraph 3 of the plaintiffs Motion for a Se cond Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendants Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 25 is stricken. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiffs Motion for a Second Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendants Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 25 is granted. Plaintiffs response 31 was thus timely filed. by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 9/1/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER that the Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Both a More Definite Statement and Amended Complaint 11 , which the court notes is not unopposed 12 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff shall have up to and including July 7, 2010, to file an amended complaint which comports with Judge Arguellos Order of June 8, 2010 9 , using the complaint form for pro se plaintiffs that is available in the Clerks Office. No further extensions will be granted. The court notes th at the plaintiff was not directed by Judge Arguello to also file a separate more definite statement. Instead, Judge Arguello instructed plaintiff to file an amended complaint that comports with her Order 9 . by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/29/2010.(erv, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER Status Conference set for 8/2/2010 03:30 PM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/10/2010. (mjwcd) |
Filing 9 ORDER Denying as moot 4 Motion to Dismiss ; granting 6 Defendants Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file an amended complaint, which comports with this Order, by no later than Monday, June 28, 2010, using the complaint form for pro se plaintiffs that is available at the Clerks office by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 6/8/2010.(erv, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.