Burris v. Comcast of Colorado IX, LLC, et al
Plaintiff: Kolleen Burris
Defendant: Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc. and Mark Birkholz
Case Number: 1:2010cv01265
Filed: June 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Arapahoe
Presiding Judge: Marcia S. Krieger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 103), filed February 22, 2012, is ACCEPTED; Defendants Unopposed Motion to Hold Case in Administrative Abeyance ECF No. 101 is GRANTED; The Clerk shall administratively close this case pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 subject to reopening for good cause, if appropriate, after the approval of the settlement by the Bankruptcy Court; and All pending motions ECF Nos. 16 , 80 & 81 are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/9/2012.(ervsl, )
July 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER 61 Unopposed MOTION to Seal filed by Mark Birkholz, Comcast of Colorado IX, LLC, is DENIED; and 62 MOTION to Compel filed by Mark Birkholz, Comcast of Colorado IX, LLC, is GRANTED, The plaintiff shall produce an unredacted copy of Amanda Torontos case notes on or before August 2, 2011. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/26/2011. (erv, )
July 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MINUTE ORDER: granting 68 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 9/1/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 10/3/2011. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 11/29/2011. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/6/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/22/11.(bnbcd, )
February 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER: Discovery due by 8/1/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 9/1/2011. Expert Disclosures: The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before April 4, 2011. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 10/13/2011. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/20/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/23/11. (bnbcd, )
February 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER The parties are directed to confer and to file a Joint Status Report due by 2/25/2011. by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/16/2011. (erv, )
December 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 38 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/2/10. (bnbcd, )
October 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MINUTE ORDER: granting 24 the Unopposed Motion to Amend Answer of Defendants Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, and Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing the attached Amended Answer for filing, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/4/10.(bnbcd, )
September 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL: Rule 16 Hearing set for 9/6/2011 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/17/10. (msksec, )
June 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/11/10. (mskcd)
June 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 8/17/2010 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 06/09/2010. (wjc, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burris v. Comcast of Colorado IX, LLC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kolleen Burris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
Represented By: Darin L. Mackender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: Darin L. Mackender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Birkholz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?