In re: Gemelli
| Timothy Gemelli and Kimberly Gemelli |
| Timothy Gemelli and Kimberly Gemelli |
| Sally J. Zeman |
| United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado and U.S. Trustee |
| 1:2010cv01486 |
| June 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Boulder |
| John L. Kane |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Motion to Alter or Amend and to Reconsider the June 8, 2011 Judgment. The Court's June 8, 2011 order is amended as set forth. Debtors' request for reconsideration of the merits of the June 8, 2011 order is denied, by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/29/11.(gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER Court orders that the Bankruptcy Court's denial of the Debtors' Chapter 13 Plan is affirmed, by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/8/11. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER The parties are directed to confer and to file a Joint Status Report due by 2/25/2011. by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/16/2011. (erv, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Court declines to rule on 20 Appellant's MOTION for Enlargement of Time to File Reply Brief and directs that this case be drawn to a judge and the issue of yet another extension be reserved for that judge, by Judge John L. Kane on 12/1/10. (gmssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
