Garner v. Medina et al
| Thomas Garner |
| Angel Medina and Colorado Attorney General |
| 1:2010cv01561 |
| July 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Lincoln |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 33 Notice of Appeal by Thomas Garner, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 12/28/11. (bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS. The 30 Answer To Application For Writ Of Habeas Corpus, treated as a motion for reconsideration, is granted. The 2 Application For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED as barred by the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). A certificate of appealability shall not issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 12/14/2011.(wjcsl, )
|
|
Filing
23
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD. Within 30 days from the date of this order the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a copy of the transcripts from the hearing on Applicant's Colo.R.Crim. P. 35(c) motion, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 07/25/2011. (wjc, )
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER. The portion of 16 Respondents' Answer To Application For Writ OfHabeas Corpus dealing with timeliness will be treated as a motion for reconsideration. Applicant's 15 Motion For An Order To Show Cause Why The Respondents Are Prev enting The Applicant From Filing A Reply To Their Show Cause Answer And Motion For Injunctive Relief and a 18 letter from Applicant taken by the Court as a motion to compel Respondents to facilitate inmate legal assistance are denied to the extent they seek relief related to denial of access to inmate legal assistance. Applicant's 17 Motion For Enlargement Of Time To File Habeas Corpus Reply Pending Court's Ruling On Applicant's Motion For Injunctive Relief is denied to the extent it seeks relief related to denial of access to inmate legal assistance and granted to the extent it seeks an extension of time to file a reply to Respondents' Answer, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 07/18/2011.(wjc, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER for State Court Record. Within 30 days from the date of this order the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court a copy of the complete record of Applicant's state court proceeding, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/15/11. (lsw, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER to Draw in Part and to Dismiss in Part. Claim Two is dismissed for the reasons stated in this Order. Claim One (including all sub-claims) shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer for Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 09/15/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER that within 21 days Respondents shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 21 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 07/09/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
1
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or to file the 1915 motion with a certificate showing current balance in account, by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 6/30/10. (gmssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
