Wehrley v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Scott Wehrley |
American Family Mutual Insurance Company |
1:2010cv01567 |
July 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Philip A. Brimmer |
Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 ORDER granting 43 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The trial preparation conference scheduled for February 10, 2012 and the trial set for February 21, 2012 are VACATED. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/9/12.(pabsec) |
Filing 77 ORDER. The 42 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss ADEA Claim Only and with Prejudice is converted into a Rule 15 Motion to Amend and is granted. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the complaint to eliminate his claim of a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/29/11.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 75 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's 73 Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Motion for Leave to Amend Witness List and Exhibit List is granted. Plaintiff's 70 Motion For Leave To Amend Witness List And Exhibit List To Add James Lindberg, M.D. As Witness And Report Of December 1, 2008 As Exhibit is denied as withdrawn. The hearing set for 10/28/2011 is vacated. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/17/11.(mnfsl, ) Modified on 10/17/2011 to add hearing is vacated (mnfsl, ). |
Filing 67 MINUTE ORDER: granting 64 Motion to Amend Exhibit list, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/26/11.(bnbcd, ) |
Filing 63 ORDER SETTING CASE FOR TRIAL. Five-day Jury Trial set for 2/21/2012 at 08:00 AM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Trial Preparation Conference set for 2/10/2012 at 10:00 AM before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 6/24/11. (mnfsl, ) |
Filing 41 ORDER :denying 37 Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f), by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/9/11.(bnbcd, ) |
Filing 34 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/15/10. (bnbcd, ) |
Filing 27 ORDER: granting 16 Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing the First Amended Complaint [Doc. # 21-1] Granting 21 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Substitute First Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/18/10.(bnbcd, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 8/23/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/14/10. (bnbcd, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wehrley v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Scott Wehrley | |
Represented By: | Anna Itenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: American Family Mutual Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Cathy Havener Greer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.