Florez v. McCormac et al
Joseph M. Florez, IV |
Mick (I) McCormac, Mick McCormac, Tracy (I) Coleman, Tracy Coleman, Timothy (I) Edmonds, Timothy Edmonds, Richard (I) Fisher, Richard Fisher, William (I) Brunell, William Brunell, Anthony (I) A. DeCesaro and Anthony A. DeCesaro |
1:2010cv01628 |
July 9, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Fremont |
Boyd N. Boland |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 OPINION AND ORDER granting 33 Motion to Dismiss. The 33 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Mr. Florez's remaining claim is DISMISSED, and the Clerk of the Court shall close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 08/03/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 70 MINUTE ORDER granting 68 Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Court to Move Forward with Case, to the extent that the pending motion to dismiss will be ruled on by Judge Krieger in due course, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 07/13/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 56 MINUTE ORDER granting 54 MOTION Requesting This Honorable Court Order Defendants to Serve Plaintiff With a Copy of Their Reply to Response Dated 12/27/10 within 5 days from the date of this minute order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/16/11.(lsw, ) |
Filing 32 MINUTE ORDER denying 31 plaintiff's Motion Requesting Court to Enter Order Requiring the Defendants to Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/3/2010.(mjwcd) |
Filing 29 MINUTE ORDER Denying without prejudice 23 Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel ; Denying as premature 26 Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Issue of Subpoena for Plaintiff's Evidence in this Matter. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/5/2010.(mjwcd) |
Filing 22 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/28/10. (mskcd) |
Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 09/22/2010. (wjc, ) |
Filing 16 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's first and second claims are dismissed as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1915A(b)(1). Defendants Captain Tracy Coleman, Captain R ichard Fisher, and Grievance Officer Anthony A. DeCesaro are dismissed as parties to this action because the claims against them are legally frivolous. Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Major William Brunell as a Named Defendant 5 is GRANTEd. The Clerk of the Court is directed to remove Defendant William Brunell as a party to this action. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge.By Judge Christine M. Arguello for Judge Zita L. Weinkshienkon 09/16/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 12 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/05/10. (jjh, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER Granting Plaintiff Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 1915 Without Payment of an Initial Partial Filing Fee by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/04/10. (jjh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.