Torres v. Fender et al
Francisco Torres |
Travis Fender, Michael Kim and Commerce City, City of |
1:2010cv01793 |
July 29, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Adams |
Christine M. Arguello |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/19/12. (jjpsl, ) |
Filing 51 IN LIMINE RULING DENYING ADMISSION OF PLAINTIFF'S MEDICARE LIEN re: 45 Trial Brief filed by Francisco Torres. The Court ORDERS that evidence of Plaintiff's Medicare Lien is INADMISSIBLE. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/17/12. (jjpsl, ) |
Filing 47 ORDER granting 39 Partially Stipulated Motion in Limine, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 1/12/12.(jjpsl, ) |
Filing 35 ORDER granting 34 Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Certain Claims With Prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the City of Commerce City is to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as a party to the above-captioned action.Denying as moot 32 Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment; by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/18/2011.(erv, ) |
Filing 30 MINUTE ORDER granting 28 Defendants Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Extend Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline to no later than March 3, 2011. by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 2/3/2011.(erv, ) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/30/2010. (klmcd ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.