Nagim et al v. Irving et al
Ronald Nagim and Janet Nagim |
Stephen Irving, Joseph E. Abraham, Jr., Sandra Abraham, Joseph E. Abraham, III, Alicia Pellergrin and Louisiana State University |
1:2010cv01925 |
August 12, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Arapahoe |
Robert E. Blackburn |
Assault, Libel, and Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion To Show Cause and See Proof As To Wrong Decision Made 53 filed 1/21/2011. The motion is STRICKEN. The court notes that this case is now before the Tenth Circuit. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/26/2011.(sah, ) |
Filing 49 ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 46 Notice of Appeal by Ronald Nagim, appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a proper 1915 motion with district court by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/23/10. (bjrsl, ) |
Filing 44 ORDER. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 43 filed 10/19/2010, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court. The 12b(1), 12b(2), 12b(3) and 12b(6) Motion To Dismiss [#6] filed 08/12/2010, by defendants, Stephen Irving, Josep h E. Abraham, Jr., Sandra Abraham, and Joseph E. Abraham, III, is GRANTED for lack of personal jurisdiction over these defendants in this forum. Defendant Alicia Pellegrins Motion To Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) 13 filed 08/13/2010, is GRANTED for lack of personal jurisdiction over this defendant in this forum. Plaintiffs claims against defendants, Stephen Irving, Joseph E. Abraham, Jr., Sandra Abraham, Joseph E. Abraham, III, and Alicia Pellegrin are DISMISSED WITHO UT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs claims against defendant, Louisiana State University, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment. Judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendants, Stephen Irving,Jose ph E. Abraham, Jr., Sandra Abraham, Joseph E. Abraham, III, and Alicia Pellegrin, against plaintiffs, Ronald Nagim and Janet Nagim,judgment as tothese defendants SHALL BE without prejudice. Judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendant, Louisiana State University, against plaintiffs, Ronald Nagim and Janet Nagim, as to all claims for relief and causes of action asserted against it; provided, furthermore, that judgment as to this defendant SHALL BE with prejudice. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/19/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 43 RECOMMENDATION of United States Magistrate Judge. It is Recommended that the Abraham Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 6 be granted and that the case against them be dismissed without prejudice. It is further recommended that Defendant Pellegrin& #039;s Motion to Dismiss 13 be granted and that the case against her be dismissed without prejudice. Further recommended that the case against Defendant LSU be dismissed with prejudice. Further recommended that Plaintiffs be warned that an injunction may be entered prohibiting them from filing future lawsuits against these parties in Colorado if they attempt to assert similar claims in any subsequent lawsuit in this Court by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/19/10. (jjh, ) |
Filing 42 MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion for Stay of Proceedings to Enforce Judgment 40 is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs shall not file any additional pleadings until the Court issues a recommendation on the pending Motions to Dismiss. Any pleadings filed in violation of this Order shall be stricken. Given the filing of a Response to the pending Motions to Dismiss which is signed by both Plaintiffs, the Order to Show Cause 18 is DISCHARGED. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 09/08/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 39 MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 34 Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 09/07/2010.(sah, ) |
Filing 31 ORDER denying without prejudice 29 Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 08/30/2010.(sah, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.