Alexander v. Hickenlooper et al
| Darrick Alexander |
| John Hickenlooper, Gary Whittman, Christopher Foegen, Richard Rosenthal and John Lamb |
| 1:2010cv01993 |
| August 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Logan |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
ORDER. Plaintiffs pro se Petition for Reconsideration of Courts Decision 65 is DENIED. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 6/16/2011.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 66 Notice of Appeal by Darrick Alexander, appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a 1915 motion with district court, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 06/15/11. (bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation 61 is GRANTED. Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint 20 is GRANTED and Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 10 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/25/2011.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
48
MINUTE ORDER granting 46 Defendant's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Disposition of Motino to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/17/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
41
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 39 Plaintiff's Motion to Request Permission to Amend the Complaint and Add Defendant(s), by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/8/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
35
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 32 Plaintiff's Motion to Alter and/or Amend, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/20/2011. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER. The 25 recommendation is accepted and Plaintiff's 19 Request to Reconsider Courts Order to Defendants in Their Official and Their Individual Capacities is denied, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/14/11.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
25
RECOMMENDATION that 19 Plaintiff's "Request to Reconsider Courts Order 11 to Defendants in their Official and their Individual Capacities" be denied, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/28/2010. (mehcd)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Granting Service by United States Marshal by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/24/10. (Attachments: # 1 Process Receipt and Return)(mnf2, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to A District and a Magistrate Judge. Mr. Alexander's official capacity claims against all Defendants and his individual capacity calims against all Defendants other than Office Foegen are dismissed as l egally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1 (e)(2)(B)(i). Defendants Gerry Whitman, John Lamb, Richard Rosenthal, John Hickenlooper, and Jane and John Doe are dismissed as parties to this action because the claims asserted agaisnt them are legally frivolous. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer for Judge Zita Leeson Weinshienk on 11/18/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/15/10. (gmssl, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to submit a corrected 1915 motion with a certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/18/10. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
