Hersi et al v. Allstate Insurance Company
Mohamoud Hersi, Farah Aden and Mohamud Ubahle |
Allstate Insurance Company |
1:2010cv02038 |
August 24, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
David M. Ebel |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. All the claims of Plaintiffs, Mohamoud Hersi, Farah Aden, and Mohamud Ubahle, against Defendant, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, in the above-captioned action are hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay their respective costs and attorney fees. By Judge David M. Ebel on 3/4/2011. (sah, ) |
Filing 23 PARTIAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs Second Claim for Relief, Breach of Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, and their Third Claim for Relief, Violation of C.R.S. § 10-3-1116 are dismissed with prejudice and Allstate is released and discharged from all past and future claims under common law claims of breach of good faith and fair dealing and all past and future alleged violations of C.R.S. § 10-3-1116. Both parties are to pay their own costs and attorney fees. By Judge David M. Ebel on 2/2/2011. (sah, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER : Scheduling Conference set for 10/21/2010 02:00 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/15/10. (bnbcd, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.