Riches v. Trans-Alleghency Lunatic Asylum
Jonathan Lee Riches |
Trans-Allegheny Lunatic Asylum, Eastern State Penitentiary, Florence Adx and Lynwood Correctional Facility |
1:2010cv02116 |
August 31, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Boyd N. Boland |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER Dismissing Case and Imposing Sanctions. Ordered that the Instant action is dismissed pursuant to Rules 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the failure of Plaintiff to cure the deficiencies designated in the 08/31/10 order within the time allowed. Ordered that Mr. Riches is prohibited from filing new actions in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado without representation of a licensed attorney admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado unless he obtains permission to proceed pro se by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/25/10 for Zita Leeson Weinsheink(jjh, ) |
Filing 1 ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency and to Show Cause. Plaintiff is directed to submit a 1915 Motion, Prisoner Complaint, and show cause why filing restrictions should not be imposed against him, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/26/10. (lyg, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.