Sandles v. Denver Downtown Correctional Facility et al
| Burton Sandles |
| Denver Downtown Correctional Facility, Chris Keiler, Conner and McCall |
| 1:2010cv02146 |
| September 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MINUTE ORDER denying 17 Plaintiff's Second Amended Motion for Reconsideration, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 12/10/10.(mnf, )
|
|
Filing
16
Minute ORDER denying 15 Amended Motion for Reconsideration by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 11/10/10.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER denying 13 Motion for Reconsideration by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/04/10 for Zita Leeson Wienshienk(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the Prisoner Complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed within the time allowed to either pay the initial partial filing fee or to show cause why he was unable to pay the initial partial filing fee by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/20/10 for Zita Leeson Weinshienk(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff directed to submit a certified copy of trust fund statement, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/31/10. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
