Vasquez v. Zavaras et al
| Paul Luna Vasquez |
| Aristedes W. Zavaras, David L. Michaud, Gloria Barela and Michelle Aragon |
| 1:2010cv02233 |
| September 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Bent |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER of Dismissal. Ordered that the Application is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Ordered that no certificate of appealability will issue because Mr. Vasquez has not made a substantial showing that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the procedural ruling is correct whether the underlying claim has constitutional merit. Order denying as moot 12 Motion to Amend Application by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/03/10.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
9
Minute ORDER denying as inappropriate and moot 7 Motion for Default Judgment by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/01/10.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER to File Preliminary Response. Ordered that within 21 days Respondent shall be file Preliminary Response. Ordered that within 21 days of the filing of the Preliminary Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/07/10. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt)(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Applicant to File Amended Application within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/22/10. (jjh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
