Elkins v. Franklin et al
Petitioner: Jeffrey Elkins
Respondent: Eric Franklin, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Colorado Department of Corrections
Case Number: 1:2010cv02270
Filed: September 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Boyd N. Boland
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER denying 3 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. No certificate of appealability will issue because Applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. This case is dismissed with prejudice. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/17/11. (mnf, )
March 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court a copy of the complete record of Applicant's state court proceedings, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/2/11. (mnf, )
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/18/2011. (sah, )
September 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER to File Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 21 days Respondent shall file a Pre-Answer Response. Ordered that within 21 days of the filing of the Pre-Answer Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/30/10. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt)(jjh, )
September 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting 5 Motion to Accept the Amended 1915 Motion. Order granting 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and denying as moot 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/29/10.(jjh, )
September 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant instructed to submit a corrected 1915 Motion, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/14/10. (lyg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elkins v. Franklin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeffrey Elkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric Franklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Colorado Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?