Design Basics, LLC et al v. ProBuild Company LLC et al
| Design Basics, LLC and Prime Design, Inc. |
| ProBuild Company LLC, ProBuild North, LLC and Lanoga Corporation |
| 1:2010cv02274 |
| September 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Robert E. Blackburn |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice 95 is APPROVED. The Trial Preparation Conference set for 1/6/2012 is VACATED. The jury trial set for 1/23/2012 is VACATED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/3/2011. (sah2, )
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER denying 50 Motion to Dismiss, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/4/11.(lsw, )
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER: granting in part and denying in part 70 Motion to Compel; granting 79 Motion to reply. The plaintiffs shall make supplemental discovery responses consistent with this Order on or before July 21, 2011, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/30/11.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER re: 67 MOTION to Continue Pretrial Deadlines filed by Prime Design, Inc., Design Basics, LLC is granted. Rule 702 Motions: All motions raising issues under Fed. R. Evid. 702 as codified and construed shall be filed by September 1, 2011, and m arshaled thereafter as prescribed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C. Discovery due by 9/10/2011. Dispositive Motions due by 10/11/2011. The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ . P. 26(a)(2) on or before August 2, 2011. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 11/25/2011. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/1/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/9/11. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER : denying as moot The Motion to Stay [Doc. # 48] and 49 Defendants Motion for Order Requiring Plaintiff to Bear the Cost of Their Discovery. The hearing set for March 10, 2011, at 10:30 a.m., is VACATED, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/9/11.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER. Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint 27 is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Motion and Brief Supporting Motion to Compel Discovery 36 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The defendants shall provide supplemental discovery responses, produce all responsive documents, and serve the required privilege log compelled by this Order on or before3/14/2011. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/16/2011.(sah, )
|
|
Filing
33
PROTECTIVE ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/31/11. (bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
22
TRIAL PREPARATION CONFERENCE ORDER: Trial Preparation Conference set for 1/6/2012 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn.Ten (10) day Jury Trial set for 1/23/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom A1001 before Judge Robert E. Blackburn. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/8/10. (rebsec, )
|
|
Filing
20
MINUTE ORDER :denying 18 Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Mediation. The Scheduling Conference will still go forward on December 8, 2010, at 2:30 p.m, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/30/10.(bnbcd, )
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER : Scheduling Conference set for 12/8/2010 02:30 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/26/10. (bnbcd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
