Hudson v. Mason et al.
| Dwayne A. Hudson |
| Todd Mason, Richard Schneider, Denver Police Department, Colorado Parole Board, Sara Phelps, Tracy Sharp and Division of Adult Services |
| 1:2010cv02276 |
| September 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Denver |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 19 Notice of Appeal by Dwayne Hudson, appellant has 30 days to submit a proper 1915 motion to district court by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 03/31/11. (bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER of Dismissal. ORDERED that the Second Amended Complaint and Action are dismissed without prejudice, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 2/22/11. (lyg, )
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Second Amended Complaint within 30 days. Order denying as moot 10 Motion to Amend Complaint by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/17/10.(jjh, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER Allowing Plaintiff to Proceed Without Payment of an Initial Partial Filing Fee, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/8/10. (mnf, )
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff instructed to submit a corrected 1915 Motion and Complaint, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/15/10. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
