McKinnis et al. v. Fitness Together Franchise Corporation
Plaintiff: Paul D. McKinnis and Dalriada Enterprises, LLC
Defendant: Fitness Together Franchise Corporation
Case Number: 1:2010cv02308
Filed: September 20, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER for Dismissal With Prejudice re: 26 by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 09/08/11. (jjh, )
August 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER For Calendar Call set for 10/28/2011 at 08:00 AM in Courtroom A and counsel are to prepare a joint statement to be handed up when the case is called, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/25/2011. (rpmcd)
February 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Minute Entry-Courtroom Minutes for Scheduling Conference held on 2/11/2011 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend its Complaint to Bring Breach of Contract Claim, filed February 10, 2011 21 , is denied. Scheduling order approved. (FTR: K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)
January 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 Minute ORDER granting 19 Unopposed Motion for Leave to Reset Scheduling Conference for 2/11/2011 at 10:00 AM in Conference Room and proposed schedulingorder, in paper form, shall be submitted directly to chambers on or before February 3, 2011, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/7/2011.(rpmcd)
December 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 2/18/2011 at 11:00 AM in Conference Room and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on February 10, 2011, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/29/2010. (rpmcd)
December 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Denying 15 Plaintiffs' Motion for Certification of Order for Interlocutory Appeal, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/17/2010.(rpmcd)
December 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION. ORDERED: First, second, third, fourth and sixth claims for relief are dismissed. Defendant's motion to dismiss and for summary judgment on the fifth claim is denied. This action will proceed on that claim and the defendant will answer it on or before December 28, 2010, re 4 and 10 , signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/6/2010.(rpmcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKinnis et al. v. Fitness Together Franchise Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul D. McKinnis
Represented By: Harold R. Bruno, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dalriada Enterprises, LLC
Represented By: Harold R. Bruno, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fitness Together Franchise Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?