Park v. TD Ameritrade Trust Company Inc. et al
Lori L. Park |
TD Ameritrade Trust Company Inc., TD Ameritrade Online Holdings Corp., TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation, Toronto-Dominion Bank, The, Joseph H. Moglia and J. Thomas Bradley, Jr. |
1:2010cv02599 |
October 25, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
Denver |
Boyd N. Boland |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 138 ORDER denying 130 Plaintiff's Further Motion in Opposition to Close this Action and Procedure to Report Felony Level Conduct to a Federal Judge. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/10/12.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 129 ORDER. Plaintiff's 127 Motion in Opposition to Federal Judge to Close this Case, Request for Settlement Agreement Conference, Motion to Request Attorney to be Assigned to Plaintiff, and for Procedure to Report Felony Level Conduct to a Federa l Judge and 128 Further Motion in Opposition to Close this Case, Motion for an Attorney, Continuance in Light of Joint Settlement Conference Request, and Procedure to Report Felony Level Conduct to a Federal Judge are denied. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/19/11.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 126 ORDER IMPOSING FILING RESTRICTIONS. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/14/11. (mnfsl, ) |
Filing 123 ORDER denying 122 Motion to Further Recuse Judge Tafoya & Judge Brimmer & to Call for Full Investigation of Said Acts. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/6/2011.(jjpsl, ) |
Filing 121 ORDER denying 119 Plaintiff's Request for Procedure to Report to a Federal Judge the Threatening Conduct of Gary Eternick of Fiserv Et Al & Defendants. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/1/11.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 118 ORDER. The 90 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is accepted and this case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Judgmetn shall enter accordingly. Defendants' 67 motion to dismiss is denied as moot. The remaini ng 104 , 106 , 107 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 pending motions are denied. Plaintiff shall have until 12/13/2011 to file written objections to the proposed filing restrictions; such objections shall be filed in a singl e document not to exceed 15 pages without leave of the Court. In the absence of timely objections, the restrictions shall take effect on 12/14/2011. If plaintiff does file timely objections, the restrictions shall not take effect until the Court rules on the objections. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 11/30/11.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 105 ORDER. As a sanction against the plaintiff as ordered by the court on 8/4/2011, the amount of $1,410.00 is hereby awarded to the Defendants and against Plaintiff Lori Park. The total amount of the sanction shall be remitted by certified funds from the plaintiff and payable to the law firm of Kutak Rock, LLP in full on or before 12/9/2011. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 11/9/11. (mnfsl, ) |
Filing 103 ORDER. Plaintiff's 29 Motion for Reconsideration and/or Alternative Relief from Order/Judgment is denied. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/27/11.(mnfsl, ) |
Filing 102 ORDER. ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for recusal 95 is DENIED, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/25/11.(lyg, ) |
Filing 72 ORDER denying 57 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Pending Completion of 10th Cir. Appeals Court Decision of 11-1157 (District No 10-cv-03136-ZLW). By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/18/11.(mnf, ) |
Filing 71 MINUTE ORDER denying 69 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Add Additional Materials. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/15/11.(mnf, ) |
Filing 52 Second ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 8/4/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 5/10/11. (mnf, ) |
Filing 48 ORDER. Case 11-cv-00875-PAB-KLM is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is to file a copy of this Order in in this case. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/3/11. (mnf, ) |
Filing 35 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. In case 11-cv-000875-PAB, Plaintiff has been ordered to show cause by 4/14/2011 why the instant action should not be dismissed as duplicative of this case. The Clerk shall file a copy of this Order in this case. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/6/11. (mnf, ) |
Filing 30 ORDER denying 13 Motion for Reconsideration. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the Court file a copy of this Order in Park v. TD Ameritrade Trust Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 10-cv-02599-PAB-KMT, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/30/11.(lyg, ) |
Filing 27 ORDER of Dismissal in Lori L. Park v. TD Ameritrade Trust Company, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 10-cv-03136-ZLW as duplicative of Lori L. Park v. TD Ameritrade Trust Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 10-cv-02599-PAB-KMT. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the Court file a copy of this Order in Park v. TD Ameritrade Trust Company, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 10-cv-02599-PAB-KMT, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 3/17/11. (lyg, ) |
Filing 23 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 4/21/2011 at 11:15 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 2/28/11. (mnf, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER Granting Service by United States Marshal, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/20/10. (Attachments: # 1 Process Receipt and Return)(mnf, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/14/210. (sah, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint within 30 days by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/05/10. (jjh, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.