Scott v. Warden of the Buena Vista Correctional Complex
| Lynn Eugene Scott |
| Warden of the Buena Vista Correctional Complex |
| 1:2010cv02716 |
| November 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Chaffee |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER Denying Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal after Review re 39 Notice of Appeal, by Lynn Scott, by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/28/11. (bjrsl, )
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER denying 36 Mr Scott's Motion to Amend with State Exhausted Claim; denying 37 Motion for Reconsideration by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/9/2011.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 30 Respondents Motion to Dismiss Matter as Moot. Petitioner Lynn Eugene Scotts Application For a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is denied for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. No certificate of appealabil ity will issue because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the jurisdictional ruling is correct and whether the Petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right. This case is dismissed without prejudice. by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/24/2011.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying without prejudice 20 Applicant's Motion to Compel Discovery; Applicant's request for sanctions for failure to provide discovery is DENIED; granting 24 Respondent's Motion for Leave to File Reply to Traverse by Judge William J. Martinez on 6/3/2011.(ervsl, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER denying Applicant's 16 Motion to Consolidate Cases; denying 18 Applicant's Motion to Appoint Counsel by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/25/2011.(erv, )
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER. The parties are directed to confer and to file, on or before 2/28/2011, a Joint Status Report. By Judge William J. Martinez on 2/18/2011. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DRAWING CASE. This case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/27/2010. (sah, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER to File Preliminary Response. Ordered that within 21 days Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response. Ordered that within 21 days of the filing of the Preliminary Response Applicant may file a Reply by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/06/10. (jjh, )
|
|
Filing
1
ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiency. Applicant instructed to submit a 1915 Motion, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/5/10. (lyg, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scott v. Warden of the Buena Vista Correctional Complex | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Lynn Eugene Scott | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden of the Buena Vista Correctional Complex | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
