Rueb et al v. Zavaras et al
| Justin Rueb, Leroy Armijo, Rudy Ball, Clifton Blecha, Cesar Cabrera, Jr., Raymond Cain, Francisco Cordoza, Shane Crook, Roy Hernandez, Jacob Ind, Alan Meads, Gilbert Montur, Jacob Oakley, Patrick Placensio, Larry Scott, George Shanklin, Shawn Shields, Vernon Templeman, Larry Upton, Jared Villareal, Daryl Wagner, Sidney Blake and Patrick Ramirez |
| Aristedes Zavaras, Robert Allen, Eugene Atherton, Dennis Burbank, Brian Burnett, Anthony DeCesero, Susan Jones, Angel Medina, Kevin Milyard, Danice Neal, Joe Ortiz, Larry Reid and John Suthers |
| 1:2010cv02725 |
| November 8, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Fremont |
| Boyd N. Boland |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 36 Notice of Appeal by Justin Rueb, Jacob Oakley, Vernon Templeman and Raymond Cain, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/10/11. (bjrsl, )
|
Filing
34
ORDER of Dismissal with Prejudice. ORDERED that the complaint and action are dismissed with prejudice, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/6/11. (lyg, )
|
Filing
29
ORDER Overruling Objection. The 28 Motion to Alter and Amend Judgment is construed liberally as an objection, and the objection is overruled. Mr. Rueb allowed 20 days from the date of this order to file the amended complaint, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 6/30/11.(lsw, )
|
Filing
27
(ORDER) Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, within 30 days, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/19/11. (lyg, ) Modified on 5/19/2011 to correct punctuation (lyg, ).
|
Filing
22
Minute ORDER denying as premature the motion 21 that Plaintiff filed pro se on 4/8/11 asking for this case to "move forward" as "non frivolous," and for the Court to serve Defendants, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/11/11.(lyg, ) Modified on 4/11/2011 to correct punctuation (lyg, ).
|
Filing
19
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 17 Notice of Appeal by Justin Rueb, appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a 1915 motion with district court by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 03/21/11. (bjrsl, )
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Without Payment of an Initial Partial Filing Fee. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Case Status Updates 13 is denied as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's &quo t;Motion for An Order Ordering the Court Clerk's Office to Mail Plaintiff Rueb a Court-Stamped Copy of the Title Pages for Each of the Three Civil § 1983 Complaints (02725, 02726, and 02727)" 14 is denied, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/8/11.(lyg, )
|
Filing
4
ORDER Denying Permissive Joinder, and Dismissing Plaintiffs Other Than Justin Rueb. Ordered that Mr. Rueb cure the deficiencies within 30 days. Ordered that Mr. Rueb's request to serve Defendants through an attorney who has not entered an appear ance in this action is denied. Ordered that Mr. Rueb's request for the Court to mail materials to the dismissed Plaintiff is denied. Ordered that Mr. Rueb is directed to make arrangements within 30 days for the material to be mailed or picked up at his expense. Ordered that the clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of the Local Rules to Mr. Rueb. Ordered that the clerk's office correct the docketing records for this action to include Mr. Rueb's aliases by Judge Philip A. Brimmer for Zita L. Weinshienk on 11/12/10. (jjh, ) Modified on 11/15/2010 to add correct judge signature (jjh, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.